JOHANNESBURG — South African all-rounder Wiaan Mulder stunned the cricketing world by declaring on 367 not out in a Test match against Zimbabwe, deliberately passing up the chance to surpass Brian Lara’s legendary record of 400*—the highest individual score in Test history. Mulder’s decision has sparked debate, with many praising his sportsmanship while others questioned whether he missed a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
The 25-year-old, playing in just his 15th Test, batted for nearly two days at the Wanderers, dismantling Zimbabwe’s bowling attack with a mix of classical strokeplay and calculated aggression. By the time he reached 367, Mulder had already broken South Africa’s previous highest individual score—Hashim Amla’s 311* against England in 2012—but chose not to pursue Lara’s iconic milestone.
A Selfless Decision
Mulder’s declaration left fans and analysts divided. Some argued that records like Lara’s are rare and should be chased, while others applauded his team-first mentality. "Records come and go, but winning matches for your country is what matters," Mulder said in the post-match press conference. "Brian Lara’s 400 is sacred—it’s part of cricket history, and I didn’t feel the need to chase it."
Former Proteas captain Graeme Smith weighed in, calling Mulder’s innings "one of the greatest displays of selflessness in modern cricket." Meanwhile, Zimbabwe’s coach Dave Houghton admitted relief, joking, "We were running out of bowlers—another hour and we might have had to bring in the team chef!"
Why Lara’s Record Stands Alone
Brian Lara’s 400* against England in 2004 remains untouched for nearly two decades. The innings, played in Antigua, was a masterclass in endurance and concentration. Unlike Mulder’s situation, Lara batted for a struggling West Indies side desperate to avoid defeat. His record-breaking knock ensured a draw, cementing his place in cricketing folklore.
Key factors that make Lara’s 400* unique:
- It came in a must-not-lose situation for West Indies.
- Lara faced 582 deliveries—nearly 97 overs—showcasing unmatched stamina.
- No other batter has crossed 400 in Test cricket since.
The Debate: Should Mulder Have Gone For It?
Cricket purists argue that Mulder’s decision honored the spirit of the game, while modern analysts suggest he missed a chance to etch his name in history. Former Australian opener Matthew Hayden, who scored 380 against Zimbabwe in 2003 (then a world record before Lara reclaimed it), told ESPN: "You never know if you’ll get another shot at something like this. But his humility is refreshing."
South African coach Shukri Conrad defended Mulder, stating, "Wiaan’s mindset was always about the team. We had a series to win, and he put that above personal glory." The Proteas went on to secure an innings victory inside four days.
The Future of Batting Records
With Test cricket increasingly favoring bowlers in recent years, Lara’s 400* seems even more untouchable. Only three players—Lara, Hayden, and Mahela Jayawardene (374)—have crossed 370 in Tests. Mulder’s 367 now sits fourth on that list, but his refusal to chase the record raises questions:
- Will we ever see another 400 in Tests?
- Should personal milestones take a backseat to team objectives?
- Does modern cricket’s fast-paced nature discourage marathon innings?
Former England captain Nasser Hussain summarized the dilemma on Sky Sports: "Mulder’s innings was phenomenal, but part of me wishes he’d gone for it. Records inspire generations. Still, his humility is a lesson for every young cricketer."
Conclusion: A Legend Respects a Legend
Brian Lara himself reacted to Mulder’s innings on social media, posting: "What a phenomenal player Wiaan Mulder is! Records are meant to be broken, but his respect for the game is even more admirable. Well played, champion!"
Mulder’s 367* will be remembered not just for its brilliance but for the grace with which he walked away from history. In an era where individual accolades often dominate headlines, his team-first approach serves as a reminder of cricket’s deeper values.